Just a year and a half ago, I never would have referred to Wikipedia as a resource--how can something that can be edited by everyone be accurate? Only professors and professionals should be deemed trustworthy, right? Amazing how my mind has been changing. Now, I think Wikipedia is a great starting point for a quick intro on a topic. No, I wouldn't let a student of mine cite it as a source in lieu of peer reviewed journals, but I do recognize its value. In "The Machine is Us/ing Us" video*, one part reads: "Digital text [and hyper text and the web] is no longer just linking info. The web [and web 2.0] is linking people...people sharing, trading, and collaborating." Sounds just like libraries--we no longer just match information needs, we are now "about innovation, about people, and about community building" (source: Wikipedia on Library 2.0). Yup. And a lot of those 2.0 concepts aren't so new for libraries, but the technology part is where the libr...
School librarianship with a perspective from Shanghai American School in China